The Tea Party PAC Website faces constant attacks. The site has more than 5000 members nationwide, but the constant barrage of SPAM and spamming Members requires constant maintenance.
The Tea Party will live on through groups that have full time staff to manage it.
Thank you for the fight! Keep it up we have the Liberals on the run!
March 1st will generate a lot of news with the onset of sequestration. Obama will still be blowing his horn about his self inflicted spending castration that he himself and his administration devised. The GOP will continue to lay low and fail to offer a retort or the talking points that they should. The lamestream media and their legislative democrat ilk will continue to spew the bull… that cutting the increase in spending by 15 billion will shut down the governments’ ability to take care of the poor, the uneducated, the elderly, the sick and the stupid people. For me none of this historically repeated rhetoric will mean much because March 1st has a different meaning for me.
March 1st 2012 I lost a friend and compatriot, Andrew Breitbart. He was the lone wolf of American Journalism. One of the few voices unafraid to challenge the liberal left with full force. He put his own ideals on the line when he began to see his liberal coliseum crumble. He did what few liberals have ever done, he challenged his own and when they could not justify, excuse or explain their ideologue he left them and came over to our side. We one that day, we conservatives. We finally had a proponent who got it. More than Fox News, an organization that I know well. More than the GOP who continues to flop around between RINOs and the Tea Party not able to figure out which one they should become. Andrew did it on his own. He started his internet sites from scratch, built an organization from the ground up in spite of Obama’s chant that he did not build it, he did. He taught us much. He held his ground. He was a patriot.
So while you all will be fighting about the non-event of sequestration, I will be taking a day off. A well deserved quiet day of remembrance. A day to honor my friend and his fight for freedom as a part of the Tea Party movement. March 1st National Tea Party Day.CPAC Speech
The AP/GFK poll shows that 31% of likely voters consider themselves Tea Party supporters. With 131 million votes cast in the 2008 elections, that translates into an incredible voting bloc of 41 million Tea Party supporters waiting to cast ballots. These voters have already made their voices heard in Wisconsin earlier this year, as well as in Republican primaries in Texas and Nebraska.
That 31% of likely voters figure is greater than the 19% who described themselves as either strongly or somewhat liberal. Surprisingly, liberals have escaped media characterization as being a small, fringe-like group with little power or influence. At 19% of likely voters, self-described liberals would have a turnout of 25 million voters, some 16 million fewer voters than the Tea Party.
Meanwhile, self-described liberals fell 11% from the initial sample to the likely voter sample, while moderates increased by 3% and conservatives increased by 8%. This enthusiasm gap could make the difference in November. Once unregistered and unlikely voters were removed from the AP poll sample, Obama’s share of the vote plummeted by 10%, while Romney’s share of the vote increased by 28%. That support is driven, of course, by a supposedly dead movement. Overall, the poll shows a statistical tie with Obama at 47%, and Romney at 46%.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/28/41-Million-Tea-Party-Supporters-Set-to-Vote
My father fought in WWII. He like many of our fathers, went to battle a terror. Adolph Hitler, who took control over Germany as a member of the German Worker’s Party, an early form of a unionized group that translated to “Free Workers Committee for a good Peace” The union transformed into the Nazi Party after morphing from the National Socialist German Worker’s Party. That much says it all. On the basis of Socialism, something the current US Democratic party embraces; came the rubble we now call the Holocaust.
My father went first to Africa and then to Italy to fight the horrors that took place when Hitler’s Socialist dream turned to reality and he went to war for control of the world.
Today the democrats’ actions speak in resemblances to a time of oppression. The President of Chic-Filet voices his opinion in support of traditional marriage and three Democrat mayors condemn him and attempt to deny his business the right to open in their cities.
The President condemns business people and claims that without the government they could not have achieved success. He forces government controlled mandatory health insurance on its citizens. He wants to take from the achievers and give to the people who fail to achieve. He wants to expand the free hand out programs until he has broken those who work and succeed independently. He wants to decide who will succeed and who will fail.
How close are these intentions to that of Adolph in 1919 when he bore the ideas that hundreds of thousands of people died from?
My father loved John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Not because he was a Democrat or the first Catholic President. He loved him because of his eloquent inspirational speeches, because he did not vote with party he voted with conscience. He supported a free democratic republic where Americans had choices. There are no Democrats that can even remember the words of JFK let alone his intentions.
“My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” John F. Kennedy
So to those people who say you’ll support the democrats because they support your unions, do you know how close you are to the intentions of terror? To those of you who say you support the Democrats because they support lower and middle class are you prepared to give up your freedoms in exchange or security? To those of you who say you’ll support the Democrats because Socialism really isn’t that bad, do you know that once you make that change, there is no turning back?
In 2012 the Democrats are not your father’s Democrats. Guard your future and protect your children’s future. Vote Republican to secure our Constitution.
Dear Dr. Paul,
I am just a mother and a grandmother who so loves this country and the concept of freedom that stands faithfully behind our lovely United States Constitution. While I respect your views, I also see that you have collected a vast and deep following of people over the course of your admirable career. But, I must ask you now to consider the path you have chosen and the priorities of it. I must ask that you define for those followers, what is the best path for the greater good of us, the American people. I have been involved in politics at a local level since the 1970’s. I have served on a public level, but rarely delved into the national level until 2008. Today with little experience, I run a PAC, a political action committee under the blanket of the independent grass roots movement of the Tea Party. I’ve been an independent voter for over 42 years over 10 election cycles voting for both Democrats and Republicans who hold a fiscal and Constitutional conservative ideology. Now I realize something critical to both the path and direction of this great country, I must chose a side that stands clearly against the progressive movement toward a foundation that squarely stands on the opposite side of Socialism, Marxism, Fascism and eventually Communism, and that stance falls on the Republican Party. While a presidency held by Governor Romney is not as conservative as I like, I recognize for the good of all of the US people; Mr. Romney is the only opportunity we have to continue to live under the Constitution I swore a pledge of allegiance to for the better part of my entire life. So I ask you, plain and simple, transparent, from the bottom of my heart to do the same. The people who follow you have clearly stood for the Constitution, but unfortunately they also blindly follow your direction and some are willing to follow that dedication to the end of the freedom. They as well as all Americans need your direction now. They need to be told you are no longer seeking the office of the President of the United States and they need to be given your choice of endorsement. Without this, all of what you have stood for will soon fall to the ashes of the end of this great nation, the end of a free people. Ronald Regan once said freedom was the last stand in the United States and here we are, at the end of the road. Those of us who never stood with either party now realize that another 4 years of a leftist, progressive presidency will end all that we have stood for, for the last 240 years. It’s time Dr. Paul, it’s time for you, like I, to make your choice.
You have no possible way to win your honorable fight. You have given your all and those on either side have lost, but we as Americans have lost the most. While I understand your attempts and respect your positions now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country; this includes you Dr. Paul. We need to be united so that we will live to vote another day. I urge you to come forward, admit your campaign is over and make an endorsement so that those people who blindly follow can make their choice. And if you have any bit of concern over the future of the US Constitution I ask that you give us a start to turn the paradigm back, to move the road toward a better, more conservative America and endorse Mitt Romney. While he is not the most conservative person to guide this nation through the extremely hard times, he is the most conservative candidate who can win and stop the liberal progressive regression of this country and move forward with the founding principles that we have always, and will hopefully always stand for.
Very best regards,
KCurtis, National Chairwoman
Tea Party PAC of USA
The Untruthful Truther, Van Jones now claims he didn’t really sign the Truther911.org petition. It was all just a big misunderstanding. Take a look at Signature #46.
Update 9/11/2009: Signatories removed.
Posted by Janice Matthews, current Director, 911Truth.org
Following recent media-generated controversy over Obama appointee Van Jones’ signature on this Statement, he and two other signatories have requested their names be removed. That has been done.
Last week, President Obama signed into law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. This law permits Secret Service agents to designate any place they wish as a place where free speech, association and petition of the government are prohibited. And it permits the Secret Service to make these determinations based on the content of speech.
Thus, federal agents whose work is to protect public officials and their friends may prohibit the speech and the gatherings of folks who disagree with those officials or permit the speech and the gatherings of those who would praise them, even though the First Amendment condemns content-based speech discrimination by the government.
The new law also provides that anyone who gathers in a “restricted” area may be prosecuted. And because the statute does not require the government to prove intent, a person accidentally in a restricted area can be charged and prosecuted, as well.
Permitting people to express publicly their opinions to the president only at a time and in a place and manner such that he cannot hear them violates the First Amendment because it guarantees the right to useful speech; and unheard political speech is politically useless. The same may be said of the rights to associate and to petition. If peaceful public assembly and public expression of political demands on the government can be restricted to places where government officials cannot be confronted, then those rights, too, have been neutered.
Political speech is in the highest category of protected speech. This is not about drowning out the president in the Oval Office. This is about letting him know what we think of his work when he leaves the White House. This is speech intended to influence the political process.
This abominable legislation enjoyed overwhelming support from both political parties in Congress because the establishment loves power, fears dissent and hates inconvenience, and it doesn’t give a damn about the Constitution. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent, and only three members of the House voted against it. And the president signed it in secret. It is more typical of contemporary China than America. It is more George III than George Washington.
President Barack Obama has a bleak message for House and Senate Democrats this year when it comes to campaign cash: You’re on your own.
Democratic congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, have privately sought as much as $30 million combined from Obama for America and the Democratic National Committee — a replay of the financial help they received from Obama in 2008 and 2010.
But that’s not going to happen, top Obama aides Jim Messina and David Plouffe told Reid and Pelosi in back-to-back meetings on Capitol Hill on Thursday, according to sources familiar with the high-level talks. It was a stark admission from a presidential campaign once expected to rake in as much as $1 billion of just how closely it is watching its own bottom line.
Messina and Plouffe told the two Hill leaders that there would be no cash transfers to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from OFA or the DNC, at least not before Election Day, the sources said.
The Fluke fiasco has caused a liberal tornado and I have to laugh at the childishness the liberals offer. They seem to think that somehow because I don’t think anyone should have to pay for someone’s promiscuity; I am somehow anti-woman. Wow that’s rich, considering I am a woman.
I agree with Rush and to put it simple enough so that even a liberal can understand, what do you call a women who asks for money for sex? Ok, I probably would have said something more like Prostitute, just like I called Landreau a gloried whore for selling her healthcare vote; the term is used to represent a woman of lesser ethics. So Rush used the term “slut” and in fact he was probably more accurate since often a slut is someone who does the deed on-the-house as it were, but I digress. None of this can make me anti-woman. I support women. I am a woman.
I, for one don’t believe the government should be making these decisions. They are not part of the powers deemed to be theirs by our Constitution. But, that’s the way Obama rolls and leave to Nancy Pelosi to stage this 30 year woman’s rights activist to cause a stir fire and further divide the nation. That is ultimately the Democrats goal.
So I was quite pleased to see a new Facebook Page called Boycott Companies who pull Advertisement from Rush.
Link: http://www.facebook.com/groups/361226457245512/
The Group has accumulated well over 200 fans in just 30 minutes. Wow! Sweet. Sorry Libs no matter how much you cry I will always support women, they just won’t be women like Fluke.
Illinois…
Official Challenges have been filed in Alabama, Massachusetts, and Tennessee. Finally the word JUSTICE is ringing true to the American people.
Numerous Organizations are popping up to support the Laws under the Constitution and put a stop to the theft of the highest office of the United States of America. Freedom Nations is one who advocates a petition to support the Eligibility Requirements be manditory in every state https://secure.freedomdonations.com/proofpositive/demand_proof_positive/?a=4962-e-active-cc
But the biggest news is that one of the states seeking justice and proof of eligibility beyond Nancy Pelosi’s certification is ILLINOIS. A State that knows too well Obama’s lack of accomplishments since he served as an Illinois Senator but the majority of his service was cloaked with Present votes. A vote to record one’s presence in the senate, but abstinence of any real stance.
Hilary Clinton called the record correctly when she said, “In the Illinois State Senate, Senator Obama voted 130 times ‘present,’” Clinton said. “That’s not ‘yes.’ That’s not ‘no.’ That’s ‘maybe.’”
This week, Retired ASAR LTC William F. Reade filed an official ballot challenge with election officials, contending that Barack Obama is ineligible to appear on the Massachusetts ballot. Reade’s challenge is well researched and filled with numerous legal citations to back his case.
But perhaps most interesting are the similarities between LTC Reade’s and
Barack Obama’s citizenship status. Like Obama, Reade was born in the United
States. But, also like Obama whose father was a Kenyan citizen and therefore a
British subject, Reade’s father was also a British subject. As such, Reade
correctly points out that he himself is not a “natural born citizen” as defined
by the Supreme Court and therefore, like Barack Obama, Reade is also ineligible
for the office of President.
Commentary: So the Liberals and Progressives can call the race card, stomp their feet and scream foul all they want the facts are facts. Obama has not been proven eligible under US law and unless he does so his HOPE is fading. He and his highly paid legal eagles failure to appear in court and failure to produce an unquestionable paper document proving his citizenship are still yet to be found. 3 years is a long time to hide Obama, we’re coming.
Best,
The Tea Party
Thank you Mr. President, for bringing up the issue of fairness. I’m sure that’s important to many people. One curious thing, though, with regard to the application of “fairness” it seems that all the recommendations you have, are decided by the government. Who decides what is fair?
Here’s some suggestions:
The average Federal employee can be paid no more than the average American employee, currently $42K a yr. Wouldn’t that be fair? And the highest amount paid to any retired Federal employee should be no more than the highest Social Security monthly amount. Wouldn’t that be fair?
In the past few years, average Americans have lost ten percent of their income. All Federal employees shall receive ten percent pay cuts, and only receive increases when the average American earns more. Isn’t that fair? After all, how can the government hope to get more money from taxpayers who are earning less?
Working middle class Americans can’t leave a job for months or years, look for a new job, and still get paid. Why should government employees be able to run for any federal office while holding and being paid for another elected office?
No employee in any Federal or state job should receive more than one pension. That sounds fair.
The Senate hasn’t passed a budget in 1,000 days. They should lose their paychecks and all fringe benefits until they pass a budget. Isn’t that fair?
No one who worked in Congress can ever work as a lobbyist. Including staffers. Sounds fair to me.
Everyone who travels on Air Force One must pay their own way, be they friends of the President, First Lady, or staffers. That’s eminently fair. No American flies for free. And they must undergo full scanning and/or patdowns like all Americans. Fair is fair. If they do not pay a full amount to be determined by the CBO, their flight is counted as income and they must pay income tax on that amount, just as everyone else does for gifts. No one who flies on Air Force One can be involved in campaigning, fund raising, or Federal contracts.
The First Lady shouldn’t use any tax dollars for personal items such as clothes, 30 personal assistants. She should be limited to two assistants. Any more, they come out of the First Family’s paycheck. If she buys clothes or receives them as gifts, those items count, at full retail value, as income. She must pay income tax on that just as all other Americans do. The First Family must stop taking vacations and living lavishly on the taxes of people who lost their jobs and homes. That’s only fair.
No government worker at any level, state, Federal, or local should be part of a union with collective bargaining that makes political contributions to politicians who vote on their contracts. SEIU, NEA, AFSCME, and the other unions should not be allowed to contribute to any political campaign or party. These unions take money from taxpayers and use it to pay off politicians to give them pay/benefit raises. That gives them more say than the American taxpayers. Is that fair? It would be illegal for private employees to give money to their boss, in order to persuaded the boss to give them a pay raise. Fair is fair.
Congressional Representatives should not be allowed to invest in any interests for which they have a vote.
The President and politicians can no longer use “moral extortion” to dodge tax cuts. Such as “the poor will suffer,” the homeless will suffer, etc. In reality it’s the rich Federal workers who will suffer. The taxpayers decide what is politically correct, not the government.
It’s only fair: it’s change we can believe in. It’s only fair that voters decide what changes should be made. The Federal government has demonstrated a complete and reckless disregard for the financial needs of the average American family.
Michael Bargo Jr. January 25, 2012
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/good-idea-why-dont-we-have-a-national-conversation-about-whats-fair-mr-president/question-2417363/
Just like I said weeks ago, just like the true conservative voices on radio and TV warned you, the elite GOP is freaking out. They are writhing over Newt’s win in SC.
I’ve been accused of being a dyed in the wool Republican in blogosphere, but many of you who really know me also know that I am Republican by force. Being an independent for the last 10 elections and coming to the realization since LBJ that the Democrats are nothing more than 1980′s Russian Communists; has converted me. I will vote for anyone I feel is the best person for the job EXCEPT for anyone with a ‘D’ after their name.
So it’s easy for me to stand outside the big tents and laugh my ass off as the elitists controlling both parties fall apart. The ‘D’ elitists are still hanging on to Odumbo even as his numbers slide well below any hope of 4 more years whilst the ‘R’ elistists are looking for the candidate they can control, the candidate that will pull the wool over the moderate’s and indie’s eyes and the one who says they will stand up for the people. Cough. Cough. Truth be known that candidate doesn’t exist. Romney is too passive to fight back the same way John McLame was in 2008, see where that got us? Huntsman was a double agent, kissing the Obama’s ass while pretending he was somehow conservative. Ron Paul, well he’s still Ron Paul; someone who has been around the House for 25 years and has yet to actually accomplish something. His internal fiscal policy may have merit but as a leader of the free world the guy is pretty much a nightmare. The GOP elites could really care less about any of the other former or latter candidates.
But damn, give Newt Gingrich a nod and the GOP elitists go berserk. They can’t control Newt, they never could. Newt’s feeling the groove, he’s fighting the good fight. He stands on principle for his convictions, screw the ones that condemn him for his indiscretions. Being an independent President John F Kennedy was one of my favorites and yet we all know he could not keep in it his pants if his presidency depended on it. While Clinton was not one of my favorites simply because he sat on the fence, probably because it felt good more than any other reason and not a single Democrat sold him out for hum jobs in the Oval Office.
But, I digress… here we are in 2012 just a few months shy of another election and I’m backing the one candidate who has a pair big enough to not only take on the current morons in charge, the Democrats; and Obama, but also the elite GOP, the Paulsies and generally every so called Liberal Progressive in the political market. I trust that Gingrich is a wise man of superior intelligence who has the cajones to take on the Democratic Machine and come out smelling like a Rose.
The Newtron Bomb! Go for Newt. America loves you and we are ready for it to be Morning again in America.
“Two hours after I’m sworn in as President and by the time the Obama’s land in Chicago, I will have forty percent of Obama’s government dismantled.” – Newt Gingrich
This is the hope and change we conservatives have been searching for. Time for Conservatives to stand up for the most conservative candidate who can win. Newt Gingrich!
First – vote on this one.
Thomas Edsall, the longtime Washington Post reporter now with The Huffington Post, thinks so. No campaign wants any group of voters to know that it has written them off. But Edsall is plainly on to something. Obama campaign strategists have made it known that they are concentrating on states like Colorado and Virginia – states with high percentages of college educated voters, young voters and minorities.
‘All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment… and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic,’ longtime political reporter Thomas B. Edsall wrote in an opinion piece in the New York Times.
‘The 2012 approach treats white voters without college degrees as an unattainable cohort,’ he writes later.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2067223/President-Obamas-2012-campaign-abandons-white-working-class-voters-favor-minorities-educated.html#ixzz1iFRzzWmU
Obama’s campaign strategy will exclude White Americans without college degrees, in other words; working class Americans from efforts to gain votes because Obama concedes that he can never win the approval of these people. Instead the Obama campaign concentrates on trashing business, corporations and Wall Street where young people and minorities tend believe the rhetoric.
Most main stream middle class Americans see the biggest threat to the country as Big Government according to Gallup Poll.
When asked who represented the biggest threat to America on Dec 4 2008
53% chose big government and 31% big business more recently in Dec of 2011 the same question returned 64% for big government and 26% as big business. Clearly a divide and widening difference in the way stream Americans think versus the left coast.
Edsall recently said, “Obama no longer considers States based on the common Red and Blue identifiers, instead the Obama campaign now labels the states based on Black States and White States.”
I tried to warn you folks for the longest time, the Democrats if they so chose to follow the leader, Barack Obama will create the biggest Race War, since the 1950′s.
In a conference call with the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Republican strategists, the RNC said that “party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.” ARE YOU KIDDING ME? OMG!! That is exactly what every Republican candidate needs to do every day and ramp it up with every speech and press conference.
A story by Yahoo News claims that Republican strategists were warned that too heavy of an attack on Obama could turn voters away. The story claims that recent polling indicates that voters “feel sorry” for the President and they still give him “high approval”, in spite of record low ratings on his job approval. Hell, I feel sorry that this country could ever be so gullible to elect such an idiot. I also understand that Rush Limbaugh, conservative talk show host, just about went ballistic when he heard about this coming out of the RNC.
Apparently the RNC feels that it is OK to vilify and attack fellow Republican candidates with slurs and name calling but ‘don’t go after the President’. We hear other Republicans say that Bachman is stupid, Cain is a sex offender, Gingrich has had failed marriages and is tied to Fanny Mae, Rick Perry is stupid and look what he did with vaccinations, and so on. But don’t go after Obama because we want to prove to the independents that we are not confrontational, or mean spirited.
BULL SHIT! The Democrats don’t waste any time going after our guys with both barrels. Look what they did in 2008 when they put out a bogus story about McCain having an affair. They don’t just attack; they make it up and lie about it too. I also believe that it is Democrats, perhaps even the Presidential election committee, that is making up these stories about Cain’s sexual indiscretions. Afterall, Obama doesn’t want another black running against him. That way he won’t be able to use the “race card” as he will no doubt do if the candidate is white.
One of the reasons that Gingrich is moving ahead in the polls now is because he is out there with his attacks on Obama. Gingrich is taking it to him and the people want that. When Trump was vocal about his criticisms of Obama he soared to the top of the polling because he wasn’t afraid to speak his mind.
2012 is barely a month away so many films of my lifetime taunted the future in wild action packed movies that looked at the future as 40 years from then. Well the future is here and let me tell you, those movies were nothing compared to the reality. Mere nuclear bomb attacks leaving barren lands could not compare to the devastation of one radical in the most important position in the USA.
In my usual PartysOver fashion I am about to predict the future, unfortunately the future is the present. For those of you naysayers, I have predicted many important things over the last 5 years and have an accuracy level higher than you can imagine, but unless you are a member of my PAC or my groups you’ll have to take my word for it. But, I digress…
I’m about to predict some pretty scary things in the future, 2012.
Gun owners throughout America use public lands for target practice, hunting and training. In fact, on most BLM land it’s always been legal to do so. But new rules, that are now being drafted by the Obama Administration, could severely limit your rights to shoot on public land.
In a major move by the Obama Administration to restrict gun owners rights, the interior department is planning on banning gun owners from shooting on millions of acres of public land.
The proposed draft, if approved, will be a blow to gun owners and will also restrict the rights of hunters and limit the use of Bureau land for hunting.
The BLM is trying to sell this proposal by saying they are concerned that shooters are causing a “public disturbance.” Supposedly, people from “urban areas” are not comfortable hearing gun shots while they’re using these public lands.
“It’s not so much a safety issue. It’s a social conflict issue,” said Frank Jenks, a natural resource specialist with Interior’s Bureau of Land Management. He says that people “freak out” when they hear shooting noises on public lands.
And lets not forget the “environmental reasons.” After hundred of years of shooting on public lands it’s now apparently hurting the environment. According to the BLM shooters are endangering plants and littering public lands.
There are a few groups trying to fight this new policy change, including the National Wildlife Foundation, Cabela’s and the Wildlife and Hunting Heritage Conservation Council, but so far this story has received very little media attention. You can read the WHHCC public response at http://www.fws.gov/whhcc/doc/BLMshootingsportspolicycomments.pdf that’s the only thing we can find in the public record so far about these proposed changes.
http://offgridsurvival.com/obamahuntinggunrightsblmland/
Andrew Breitbart Tea Party Obituary
Conservative media publisher and activist Andrew Breitbart has died in Los Angeles. He was 43.
Breitbart’s website, bigjournalism.com, announced Thursday he died of natural causes in Los Angeles in the early morning hours. His death was confirmed by Breitbart.com editor-in-chief Joel Pollak, who said he was at the hospital.
He is survived by his wife Susannah Bean Breitbart, daughter of Orson Bean an American film, television, and Broadway actor she is 41, and his four children.
Breitbart served as an American Icon to the Conservative base with his hard hitting, expose reporting. His website bigjournalism.com was managed with the kind of investigative reporting that seemed to be all but extinct in the 21st century.
Breitbart grew up in liberal American suburb of Brentwood, Los Angeles CA and began his journalism career as an early contributor to the Drudge Report as a moderate Democrat. However, Breitbart moved his ideology to the right after seeing the destructive journalism of the left with the Clarence Thomas hearings. He described himself as “a Reagan conservative” with libertarian sympathies.
In April 2011 Grand Central Publishing released Breitbart’s book, Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World, in which he discussed his own political evolution and the part he took in the rise of new media, most notably at the Drudge Report and The Huffington Post.
My own personal eulogy to Andrew Breitbart is simple; he represented my hope that real journalism would be reborn from the ashes of an election that was won and lost on the basis of biased journalism. He exemplified outraged Americans by standing up to the left wing media. He fought a hard battle for the Conservative come back and in 2010 we won. He stood before us naked, down trodden and dusted himself off to come back from deep in the trenches of the liberal garbage to secure a place of reverence in the hearts of Tea Party Americans across this nation. He was the first public figure I cried for since JFK. He was Big Journalism through and through. Rest in Peace patriot, your work here is done; the rest is up to us.